Lea Spyer
Algemeiner
December 4, 2016

A newly passed US Senate bill advancing the fight against antisemitism will have a “ripple effect” on educational institutions, the head of a Jewish human rights organization told The Algemeiner on Friday.

Kenneth Marcus — president and general counsel at the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law — was referring to the unanimous passage on Thursday of the bipartisan Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2016, which identifies the phenomenon as a “persistent, disturbing problem in elementary and secondary schools and on college campuses.” It also demands that the Department of Education take into consideration the definition of antisemitism set forth by the State Department and its Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism.

Awareness of this definition of antisemitism will increase understanding of the parameters of contemporary anti-Jewish conduct and will assist the Department of Education in determining whether an investigation of antisemitism under Title VI [of the Civil Rights Act of 1964] is warranted.

“At every university, the general counsel will need to advise the administration on this new federal guidance,” Marcus told The Algemeiner. “And university policy will need to be revised to reflect it.”

The Antisemitism Awareness Act has faced criticism from members of the anti-Israel movement, which accuses it of hindering freedom of speech.

Rejecting this claim, Marcus said that the authors of the bill — Sens. Bob Casey (D-PA) and Tim Scott (R-SC) — “were very smart” in their wording, to avoid infringing on any rights.

“The First Amendment protects a lot of antisemitic speech, just as it protects lots of racist, sexist and homophobic speech. This bill wouldn’t change that. The point is that some activities are not constitutionally protected, and this bill would help the Department of Education identify which of them are antisemitic,” he said.

As Jewish students have become increasingly vulnerable targets on college campuses, Marcus said, “It’s about time the government take action.”

“Some of us have been pointing out for several years that antisemitic incidents are surging and need to be addressed. Over the last couple of years, the levels have become so unacceptable that Congress is beginning to take notice,” he added.

According to a recently published FBI Hate Crime Statistic Report, 2015 saw a major spike in antisemitism in the US, with Jew-hatred accounting for 51.3 percent of all victims targeted due to religious bias. A total of 664 antisemitic incidents were recorded.

Original Article

Kailee Jordan, one of LDB’s Communications & Development Interns, will speak at the CAMERA Conference, “War by Other Means: Israel, BDS, and the Campus,” taking place at Harvard University on Sunday, Dec. 4. The conference will focus on issues surrounding campaigns that seek to delegitimize Israel on North American college campuses, and will explore various questions, including: what fuels the anti-Israel movement movement; how did it become so prominent among student groups and faculty members; what role Jewish groups have had in this anti-Israel upsurge; and more.

The conference features experts on these issues including Professor Alan Dershowitz (Harvard), Professor William Jacobson (Cornell), Professor Miriam Elman (Syracuse), AMCHA Initiative Director Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, CAMERA Executive Director Andrea Levin, CAMERA Associate Director Alex Safian, and students from across the country.

Download PDF

Washington, D.C., December 1: Today, the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law (LDB) commends U.S. Senators Tim Scott (R-SC) and Bob Casey (D-PA) for introducing the bipartisan Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2016. This landmark bill was introduced to combat increasing incidents of anti-Semitism on college campuses nationwide. LDB is a national civil rights organization, best known for its work fighting anti-Semitism in higher education through law and public policy.

The proposed legislation would adopt the primary public policy recommendation of LDB President Kenneth L. Marcus’ new book, “The Definition of Anti-Semitism” (Oxford University Press: 2015). In “The Definition of Anti-Semitism,” Marcus explained, “For American civil rights enforcement agencies, the way forward is clear. Whatever else they may do to address resurgent anti-Semitism, the first step should be to adopt the State Department ‘s definition.”

The Brandeis Center has long urged federal domestic agencies to use established definitions of anti-Semitism in the manner that this bill would establish. LDB President Kenneth L. Marcus commented, “This will be a game-changer when it comes to protecting the rights of Jewish American college students. It will provide the most important legislative protections against anti-Semitic hatred in a generation. Given the recent spike of anti-Semitic incidents, it is quite urgently needed. Senators Scott and Casey should be congratulated for their excellent work.

“Senator Scott and Casey’s bill not only does acknowledges that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act protects Jewish students from discrimination, but also directs the Department of Education to use the State Department’s definition of anti-Semitism – which includes examples of how anti-Semitism manifests with regards to Israel – in assessing anti-Semitic incidents.”

Importantly, the proposed bill states that the State Department’s definition of anti-Semitism (http://www.brandeiscenter.com/images/uploads/resource/antisemitism.pdf) has been a valuable tool “to help identify contemporary manifestations of anti-Semitism, and include useful examples of discriminatory anti-Israel conduct that crosses the line into anti-Semitism,” and that “[a]wareness of this definition of anti-Semitism will increase understanding of the parameters of contemporary anti-Jewish conduct and will assist the Department of Education in determining whet er an investigation of anti-Semitism under title VI is warranted.”

Furthermore, it directs the Department of Education to use the State Department’s definition of anti-Semitism as part of the Department’s assessment of whether the alleged practice was motivated by anti-Semitic intent. Specifically, the bill provides as follows: “In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race,
color, or national origin, based on an individual’s actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of anti-Semitism as part of the Department’s assessment of whether the alleged practice was motivated by anti-Semitic intent.”

The bill also acknowledges the “Dear Colleague Letter” that LDB’s President Marcus issued in 2004 when he was delegated the authority of Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights. Marcus’ 2004 letter explains the obligations of schools (including colleges and universities) under title VI to address incidents involving “race or national origin harassment commingled with aspects of religious discrimination against Arab Muslim, Sikh, and Jewish students.”

“It is important for the federal government to speak in one voice,” Marcus continued. “It makes no sense for domestic federal agencies to ignore the important tools that our State Department is using.”

Aviva Vogelstein
Brandeis Blog
November 30, 2016

Earlier this afternoon, the Ohio House passed an anti-BDS bill with a vote of 83-11. This important victory marks yet another blow to the anti-Semitic Boycotts, Divestment, and Sanctions movement.

The Bill, HB 476, “to enact section 9.75 of the Revised Code to prohibit a state agency from contracting with a company that is boycotting Israel or disinvesting from Israel,” was first introduced by Rep. Kirk Schuring in February. In May, LDB President Kenneth L. Marcus testified in its support.

In his testimony, Marcus discussed how state anti-BDS bills are critical to addressing resurgent anti-Semitism in the U.S. and throughout the world, and how BDS, at its core, has always been an anti-Semitic movement. Marcus elaborated that the fact that BDS is dressed up in the language of human rights does not differentiate it from its Nazi and Arab League predecessors, which also used the rhetoric of their times to draw support for anti-Jewish boycotts.

15 other states have signed anti-BDS bills into law, most recently Pennsylvania, California, New Jersey, and Rhode Island. The bill must pass the Ohio Senate before being signed into law.

Prof. Phyllis Chesler
Israel National News
November 29, 2016

Have you ever escaped a raging fire? I have–twice, and one never, ever forgets the heat, the smell, the bright red-and-orange flames, the horror, the near-brush with death, the loss of one’s possessions or of one’s home–and the overwhelming gratitude that one’s life has been spared.

Israel has been on fire–literally, and for days, in yet another series of fiendish, co-ordinated arson attacks, otherwise known as #ArsonJihad, #Pyro-terrorism, or #BushfireJihad. Daniel Pipes has kept a running record of just such arson Jihad attacks.

In addition to Arab suicide bombings, continual rocket bombardments, kidnappings and murders via tunnel, rock throwing, stabbing, and car ramming Intifadas, fire has long been a weapon of choice for Islamists in Europe, Australia, and Israel.

In Israel, Arab Israeli Jihadists take advantage of smaller, naturally occurring forest fires to purposely set multiple additional fires. Who can forget the fires in northern Israel in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2015? Or the fact that, in addition, Arab Israelis attempted arson “at a staggering rate of two per day” in 2010?

“Hate Spaces: The Politics of Intolerance on Campus,” an important new film, brought to us by Americans for Peace and Tolerance on Campus (Charles Jacobs and executive Producer and Director, Avi Goldwasser), is about another kind of Jihad arson: the way in which the American campuses have been set ablaze by a well-choreographed and well-funded propaganda campaign against Jews and the Jewish state.

Once such propaganda takes hold, actual, physical, murderous Jihad is not far behind. The cognitive war, as my colleagues Richard Landes and Charles Jacobs know, is very hot; it, too, is on fire.

The accumulated footage of increasingly aggressive and menacing keffiyeh-and hijab-draped mobs utterly disrupting peaceful pro-Israel or truth-telling lectures; the omnipresent swastikas, anti-Jewish graffiti (“Kill all the Jews,” “”I hate Jews,” Kike”, “Dirty Jew,” ), the frightening hate speech (“Jews, your days are numbered,” “Long live the Intifada,” “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free,” “You are child murderers,” ), the prominent mock Apartheid Walls, the mock eviction notices, the dorm storming, the bullying, etc.–document what I first called the Brownshirt phenomenon on campus way back in 2003.

By now, the Brownshirts have come into their own. They rule the American campuses from coast to coast, on the subjects of Israel, Islam, Palestine, Jews, and “Amerika.” Their filthy lies, their false and lethal narratives have taken over the American academic and activist imagination. How? This film clearly and persuasively documents the role that Students for Justice in Palestine and the Muslim Student Association (MSA), both Muslim Brotherhood and terrorist-related front groups, have played through their 600 campus chapters in North America.

This most excellent film captures Berkeley’s own Hatem Bazian on camera calling for an “Intifada in this country.”
As early as 2007, the New York Police Department on terrorism “identified the MSA as an incubator for Islamic radicalism.” Indeed, as the film shows us, at least a dozen MSA leaders and members on U.S campuses, as professors and students, have participated in terrorist activities. These include Anwar al-Awlaki (Colorado State University), the man who inspired Nidal Hassan, the Ft. Hood shooter; Ramzi Yousef (Rutgers University), in prison for masterminding the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center; Aafia Siddiqui (from MIT, Brandeis), in possession of information on how to make a dirty bomb, captured in Afghanistan when she tried to shoot two American soldiers; Dzhokhar Tsarnayav (U of Massachusetts at Dartmouth), the Boston Bomber.

This most excellent film captures Berkeley’s own Hatem Bazian on camera calling for an “Intifada in this country.” He says “We’ve been watching Intifada in Palestine, we’ve been watching an uprising in Iraq, and the question is what are we doing? How come we don’t have an intifada in this country?”

My question: Why is Bazian still allowed to teach at the University of California? Why is the man who founded American Muslims for Palestine, whose various officials have been found “civilly liable in a federal court for financing Hamas,” and who founded the Students for Justice in Palestine, still allowed to teach, still a beloved professor? This group has not only launched annual conferences, it has also interrupted Jewish events on campus all over the country and been behind the BDS campaign on American campuses. Why is Bazian, whose research on alleged “Islamophobia,” co-published with CAIR, is bogus, pseudo-academic research, a professor at Berkeley?

Here’s why.

The Big Lies are protected as “academic freedom” and “free speech,” presumably in the service of anti-racism. The verbal and physical attacks against Jews are not seen as “racist” because anti-Semitism is simply not acknowledged as racism. “Micro-aggressions” of all kinds are increasingly respected; overt hatred of Jews confuses administrators who still believe that anti-Zionism does not equal anti-Semitism and that if a Jewish person is also confused–that settles the thorny matter.

Gloria Greenfield, in her films (“The Case for Israel,” “Body and Soul,” and “Unmasked: Judeophobia”); Neil Kressel in his academic research; Charles Small in his bruising encounter at Yale; Richard Cravatts in his new book, “Genocidal Liberalism: The University’s Jihad Against Israel and Jews,” have all found that Islamic Jew-hatred is endemic but missing-in-action from American curricula, textbooks, studies about prejudice, classroom lectures, and conferences on the subject. Any attempts to shed light on Islamic religious apartheid is deemed “Islamophobic.” Likewise, any attempt to tell the truth about Islamic gender apartheid is also deemed “racist,” “white nationalist,” and “colonialist.”

Here’s also why Big Lies and the Censorship of Truth have been allowed to fester on American campuses: As this film demonstrates, so many American universities have been massively–and I mean massively–funded by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. In the last six years, these three countries have donated one billion dollars to Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, John Hopkins, New York, and of course, to the University of California, and to other American universities.

We all now understand that Islamic Jew-hatred has made a treacherous alliance with Western academics and activists–something that I’ve previously described as a “Perfect Storm.” The danger to students in terms of genuine learning, and to Jews and Zionists, is not coming from the “hard right,” as much as from the “hard Left.”

This film shows us, without a doubt, the terrible sight of American students being bullied, beaten, frightened, silenced, and punished if they dare challenge the Big Lies.

Charles Jacobs is a most extraordinary hero, the founder of The David Project (2002), the American Anti-Slavery Group (1994), co-chair of the Sudan Campaign (2000), and once a Deputy Director of the Boston chapter of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting (1989). He has also taken on the ADL in articles and in a film titled “Defamation”–and that was Abe Foxman’s ADL.

“Hate Spaces” has assembled a stellar case of experts, including Alan Dershowitz, Caroline Glick, William Jacobson, Richard Landes, Kenneth L. Marcus, Melanie Phillips, Bret Stephens, Jonathan Schanzer, Susan Tuchman, and Chloe Simone Valdary. Each one says something smart, important, devastating, and true.

Melanie Phillips: “Israel is singled out in another way which is unique…not just a double standard, but an impossible standard, a standard of perfection which cannot possibly be reached…we are living in an era in which the idea of truth–objective truth–has been replaced by ideology.”

Bret Stephens: “It’s very difficult to deal with a blizzard of lies, you can always invent some kind of fiction that requires enormous efforts to prove the negative: that, in fact, it did not happen…many people who are now joining SJP (are doing so) out of a totally misguided idealism. (They are) the useful idiots of the 21st century, taken in by something that is wrong and antithetical to their own true values.”

Caroline Glick: “The more that people attach themselves to ideologies that reject reason, that reject objective reality, that reject facts, that reject history, the more likely you’re going to see very aggressive anti-Semitism.”

Richard Landes: “A lot of intellectuals are playing out a sort of colonial guilt thing, and using Israel as their sacrificial lamb…by sacrificing Israel to what is, in fact, the most ferocious imperialist, colonialist force.”

Alan Dershowitz: “We have been set back on university campuses. Ultimately, we have to rely on truth, emet, veritas, is our best friend because the facts are on our side, morality is on our side.”

Is it too late to turn back this tsunami of lies? What would an Iron Dome against Lies and Blood Libels be like? It is not only Israel that will suffer due to propaganda. The standards for truth-telling in the West, in America, among intellectuals is also on the line.

This film leaves no doubt about that.

This film is having its premiere at Symphony Space, at 7pm, November 28th, sponsored by Americans for Peace and Tolerance, CAMERA, Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, and ZOA. Come if you can or order the film for your community–you will not be disappointed.

Original Article

Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Jewish Press
November 29, 2016

There is a brand-new documentary that focuses on the relationship between American universities and their Jewish students, particularly those who support Israel. The movie is called “Hate Spaces” and that gives you an idea of how those Jewish students are treated.

Of course the name is a play on the current ridiculous yet widespread notion that American college students need “safe spaces” – sometimes equipped with crayons or puppies or soft pillows – from any ideas that might make them even a teensy bit uncomfortable.

This film is a must-see. “Hate Spaces” is so chock-full of important facts, details and examples that it could easily provide the basis for a full semester course, yet it has been masterfully edited down to a mere 110 minutes long.

Another reason why this film is so useful is that it interweaves current examples and interviews with a historic progression of the problem on American campuses.

Writer, producer and director Avi Goldwasser discussed the film with the JewishPress.com on Monday evening. He explained that he and his colleagues at Americans for Peace and Tolerance have “been observing the increased hostility toward Jewish students on campus for the past decade.” Goldwasser and his colleague Charles Jacobs produced the 2004 film “Columbia Unbecoming,” which they thought “would be a wake up call for the Jewish community and the people of New York,” Goldwasser continued.

Although the 2004 film was shocking in terms of how blatant was the animus towards Israel, it did not bring the hoped-for change. Even sadder is that things have only gotten much worse since then.

“Most people do not realize how the hostility is being institutionalized, made fashionable by a combination of forces including radical faculty, radical student organizations, and an enabling university administration. While many anti-Jewish incidents and the BDS campaign are reported by the media, few are willing to connect the dots and report on the underlying ideology and extremist organizations that are inciting the hostility.”

And connect the dots is exactly what “Hate Spaces” does. Awareness slowly dawns on the viewer as what appeared to be merely a series of ugly campus incidents is woven together. That weave reveals the comprehensive pathology undergirding the movement which is ultimately seeking to completely delegitimize Jewish identification with American Jews and the Jewish State, and which gets a pass from most university administrators.

A quote in the film from the Facebook page of Marissa Rubin, a Temple University student, pretty much sums it up: “I am tired of anti-Semitism being a completely normal occurrence, and people standing idly by because, as long as they are only going after Jews, nobody cares.”

“Hate Spaces” very effectively breaks down the issue of gross indifference towards American Jews on campus into manageable segments, such as “Tenured Hatred,” “Intersectionality,” “Privileged Hatred,” and “Failed Leadership.” There is plenty of blame to be apportioned and Goldwasser and his colleagues make strong cases for each portion.

The film also plumbs the progressive elitist drive which is married to the more raw Jew-hatred that melds to marginalize Jews on campuses. It uncovers the funding sources, the historical backgrounds and the interconnectedness of the villains.

Perhaps most pointed is the film’s criticism of the faculty and college administrators who, to be charitable, are manipulated by the dark forces in ways similar – although a billion dollars of donations does thicken the plot – to the impressionable students. The weak-kneed prog-elites are exposed as seeking acceptance and accolades for their progressive values which are completely inverted when it comes to the Jewish minority and the tiny Jewish State.

Many of those who have been diligently slogging away against the world of campus anti-Semitism are used to great effect in “Hate Spaces.” There are informed and enlightening snippets of interviews with such luminaries as the journalists and authors Melanie Phillips and Caroline Glick, along with Cornell University professor and founding blogger at Legal Insurrection William Jacobson, the Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens, Alan Dershowitz, the Brandeis Center’s Kenneth Marcus, ZOA’s Sue Tuchman, Jonathan Schanzer, Richard Landes and the ubiquitous Chloé Simone Valdary. Strong, important, concise points are made by each of them.

When he spoke to the Jewish Press, Goldwasser echoed a leitmotif of the film, one pressed especially by Melanie Phillips on camera. Truth has been distorted or even abandoned on college campuses, where “ideology and narrative trump truth.” For that reason Goldwasser is hoping that the film will “energize the public to demand that our leaders in the community and on campus live up to their stated values. What is happening on campus is contrary to American values, to values of decency.”

And every reader of this review will have the chance to be energized. You need to see the film, then you need to act. For those in the New York area, the premiere will take place this Wednesday, Nov. 30, at Symphonyspace.

Original Article

On Wednesday, November 23, LDB Attorney Aviva Vogelstein will speak on a panel to high school seniors in Baltimore, MD about anti-Semitism on college campuses. She will discuss some of the issues that are common on campuses nowadays – such as the Boycotts, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) Movement – and will offer guidance on how they should respond if they witness or experience any anti-Semitism, including legal responses.

LDB’s Kenneth L. Marcus addresses Jewish educators on “Legal Approaches to Addressing Anti-Semitism on Campus” in a national conference sponsored by the Schusterman Center for Israel Studies at Brandeis University (no relation) to address the situation “from anti-Zionism to anti-Semitism.”
http://www.brandeis.edu/israelcenter/resources/educators2016.html

November 15-16, 2016 

Harvard Law School, Nov. 15 & UVA Law School, Nov. 16

Our Soldiers Speak’s Ambassador Arthur Koll will speak to LDB law students on Tuesday, Nov. 15 at Harvard Law School, and on Wednesday, Nov. 16 at UVA School of Law, on the topic of “The Israel – Palestinian Conflict Through The Lens of Negotiations.”

Ambassador Koll is the former Deputy Director-General of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where he concluded his service as the head of the Media and Public Affairs Division. He is a former Ambassador of Israel to the Republic of Serbia and to Montenegro and served as instructor of the National Defense College. Mr. Koll also served as Consul General of the Israeli Consulate in Atlanta, USA. He is a lead lecturer and diplomatic advisor for Our Soldiers Speak http://www.oursoldiersspeak.org.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has endured for decades without a solution on the horizon. Presidents and prime ministers come and go, peace initiatives are shaped, tested and then dropped – many times without so much as making a mark in history books. In the Middle East, anarchy, extremism and brutal violence are reshaping national identities and political alliances in wars that bring cruelty and hostility to new levels. This drama is closely watched by both Israelis and Palestinians, both trying to avoid any collateral effects, appreciating the relative stability they enjoy.

This discussion will explore the background with a view to assessing whether the two sides can be brought to the table – this time to finally break the deadlock to the century-long conflict? This discussion of the history of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, from the signing of the Oslo accords to the failed attempt by Secretary of State John Kerry, will provide food for thought both for optimists and pessimists. On one thing both these sides will agree – decisions have to be made – time is running out.

The Harvard event will be co-sponsored by Harvard’s Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law (LDB) Chapter, National Security Law Students Association, Alliance for Israel, and the Jewish Law Students Association (JLSA). The UVA event will be co-sponsored by UVA’s LDB chapter and JLSA.