Jerusalem (source: Wikipedia commons) Earlier today, the Brandeis Center presented the U.S. Supreme Court with an amicus curiae brief in support of Menachem Binyamin Zivotofsky, the petitioner in the so-called Jerusalem passport case, Zivotofsky v. Secretary of State. LDB, joined by several of the nation’s leading legal and foreign affairs scholars, defended the legality of the statute permitting persons born in Jerusalem to specify that their nation of birth is “Israel.” LDB is concerned, as it explained to the Court, that “the discussion of matters pertaining to Israel often invokes double standards and unduly tortured logic that would uniquely disfavor the Jewish national homeland, and thus negatively impact the status and personal security of Jews the world over.” LDB President Kenneth L. Marcus commented, “It is both astonishing and infuriating that federal litigation is required to convince the U.S. Department of State to recognize the quintessentially obvious fact that Jerusalem is in Israel. We are pleased to provide the U.S. Supreme Court with sound guidance prepared by two powerhouse attorneys, and we are gratified that several of the nation’s most highly regarded legal and foreign affairs scholars are joining our brief.” LDB argued to the Court that this case “lends itself to a much simpler resolution than would a true dispute between the President and Congress regarding the powers to recognize the legal status of states and foreign sovereigns. The dispute over Jerusalem’s legal status is but one of many territorial disputes posing challenges for American foreign policy. While the political branches may disagree about the extent to which either might exercise the power of legal recognition, it cannot seriously be questioned that Congress’s authority to acknowledge, process and related to simple facts regarding foreign territory-disputed or not-is a function necessary and proper to the exercise of its assigned powers.” The LDB brief is important for its sophisticated explanation of the so-called “recognition power,” drawing upon a wide range of legal sources and scholarship. The LDB brief was prepared by appellate litigator Alan Gura, Esq., a member of LDB’s Legal Advisory Board, and Eugene Kontorovich, Professor of Law at the Northwestern University School of Law. Several leading legal and international affairs scholars joined LDB’s brief, including: Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, and Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law John C. Eastman, Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service, and former Dean, Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law Eugene Kontorovich, Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law David B. Kopel, Adjunct Professor of Advanced Constitutional Law, University of Denver Sturm College of Law Julian G. Ku, Professor of Law & Faculty Director of International Programs, Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Michael W. Lewis, Ella A. And Ernest H. Fisher Professor of Law, Ohio Northern University Pettit College of Law Calvin Massey, Emeritus Professor of Law, University of California Hastings College of the Law and Daniel Webster Distinguished Professor of Law, University of New Hampshire School of Law Jeremy A. Rabkin, Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law Martin H. Redish, Louis and Harriet Ancel Professor of Law and Public Policy, Northwestern University School of Law Abraham D. Sofaer, George P. Shultz Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy and National Security Affairs, Hoover Institute, Stanford Law School Louise Weinberg, William B. Bates Chair for the Administration of Justice, School of Law, University of Texas at Austin The case, Zivotofsky v. Secretary of State involves the right of a Jerusalem-born American citizen to self-identify as born in “Israel” on a U.S. passport and birth certificate. In 2002, Congress passed a law that directed the Secretary of State to record the birthplace of Americans born in Jerusalem as “Israel” on the passports and birth certificates of citizens who so request. Since the law’s enactment, the Executive Branch has stubbornly refused to enforce it, claiming that to do so would infringe on the President’s authority to “recognize foreign sovereigns.” LDB President Kenneth L. Marcus commented, “the State Department should have permitted citizens to self-identify in this manner without congressional urging, but it is especially disturbing that the State Department has resisted doing so even in the face of an explicit directive from Congress.” Petitioner Zivotofsky was born on October 2002 at Shaare Zedek hospital. His parents invoked the then-new statue and requested that their son’s place of birth be listed as “Israel.” The State Department refused to do so, claiming that Congress’ law was unconstitutional, and listed his place of birth as “Jerusalem.” Zivotofsky then sued in September 2003 to compel the State Department to comply with the law. Alyza and Nathan Lewin, both of Lewin & Lewin and members of LDB’s Legal Advisory Board, very ably represent the petitioner. Two years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed, by a vote of 8-1, that the D.C. Circuit was obligated to rule on whether Congress’ law is valid, rejecting the State Department’s argument that our lawsuit raised a “political question” that the courts should not address. See the brief here.