SunSentinel

Last May, Jews around the world faced some of the worst antisemitic attacks since World War II. In Europe and the United States, Jews were beaten and threatened with murder. While the Israeli defensive actions in Gaza were the ostensible reason for these attacks, the perpetrators made no distinction between Zionist and Jews, using the words as synonyms. And so they have become. It is imperative that governments, NGOs and civil societies around the world recognize that anti-Zionism is simply the renewal of the world’s most persistent hatred.

Ever since the USSR launched the vicious equation of Zionism as Nazism in the wake of the Six-Day War and the UN proclaimed “Zionism is a form of racism” in 1975, antisemitism has found a new garb. The 2001 Durban Conference revived the Zionism-is-racism canard and resuscitated older calumnies. Blood libel became Israeli organ theft; Jewish ritual murder became Palestinian child murder; Jewish poisoning of wells has now become tainted COVID vaccines.

During this century, deadly attacks on Jews have been far more prevalent in Europe than in the U.S. Three mass murders of Jews in the last five  years were committed by Muslim extremists born in Europe. These extremists see no difference between Jews and Zionists; neither did the German court that ruled in 2017 that the bombing of a synagogue in Wuppertol was not antisemitic but a protest against Israel. Unfortunately, the U.S. is catching up. Right-wing extremists murdered worshipers at the Tree of Life and Poway synagogues, while academics and students on U.S. campuses increasingly shout anti-Zionist epithets. A shocking survey released by the Louis D. Brandeis Center last month found that two-thirds of openly Jewish students polled feel unsafe because of antisemitism, with one in 10 reporting that they have feared physical assault because they are Jewish.

Belatedly, the European Union has recognized the need to combat continent-wide antisemitism with its Oct. 5, 2021 publication of an “EU Strategy on Combating Antisemitism and Fostering Jewish Life (2021-2030).” To its credit, this plan recognizes that “[m]anifestations of antisemitism might include Israel-related antisemitism,” and stresses the importance of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which includes examples that distinguish between mere criticism of Israel, which is not antisemitic, and statements that demonize and delegitimize Israel, which may well be, and certainly are when joined with calls for the destruction of the Jewish state. The EU’s strategy also encourages member states to develop national strategies for combatting modern antisemitism and fostering what remains of Jewish life. (In 1880, 88% of the world’s Jews lived in Europe. By 1945, this share had fallen to 35%, then to 26% in 1970 and to 9% in 2020.)

Unfortunately, most of the EU’s plan is devoted to preserving memories of a Europe in which Jewish life once flourished, rather than to examining the growing prevalence of anti-Zionism, which is a barely masked way to attack living Jews with impunity. The EU has nevertheless taken an important step, and it’s time the United States followed suit.

The United States must publish a strategy of its own for combatting antisemitism, and it should follow the EU’s example by recognizing and promoting the IHRA definition. Jewish life continues to thrive in the U.S., which is home to almost half the world’s Jews. There is thus no need to celebrate the culture of “dead Jews” here. But there is an urgent need to recognize the scourge of antisemitism masked as anti-Zionism, especially on U.S. college campuses, where progressive student groups have started to exclude “Zionists.” More and more, Jewish students are being asked to disclaim their support for Israel if they want access to student groups and academic fora.

Join us on Wednesday, November 3 at 2pm Eastern for the kickoff of our Fall and Winter Speaker Series, “The Legal Case Against BDS,” featuring Jesse Fried, Eugene Kontorovich and Benjamin Ryberg!

 

Register Here!

Jesse Fried

Jesse M. Fried is a Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Before joining the Harvard faculty in 2009, Fried was a Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Berkeley Center for Law, Business and the Economy (BCLBE) at the University of California Berkeley. Fried has also been a visiting professor at Columbia University Law School, Duisenberg School of Finance, Hebrew University, IDC Herzilya, and Tel Aviv University. He holds an A.B. and A.M in Economics from Harvard University, and a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. His well-known book Pay without Performance: the Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation, co-authored with Lucian Bebchuk, has been widely acclaimed by both academics and practitioners and translated into Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, and Italian. Fried has served as a consultant and expert witness in litigation involving executive compensation and corporate governance issues. He also serves on the Research Advisory Council of proxy advisor Glass, Lewis & Co.
Eugene Kontorovich

Professor of Law Eugene Kontorovich is one of the world’s preeminent experts on universal jurisdiction and maritime piracy, as well as international law and the Israel-Arab conflict. He is also the Director of Scalia Law School’s Center for the Middle East and International Law. Professor Kontorovich joined the Scalia Law School from Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law where he was a Professor of Law from 2011 to 2018 and an Associate Professor from 2007 to 2011. Previously, he was a Visiting Professor at the University of Chicago from 2005 to 2007 and an Assistant Professor at George Mason School of Law from 2003 to 2007.

Professor Kontorovich has published over thirty major scholarly articles and book chapters in leading law reviews and peer-reviewed journals in the United States and Europe, including the American Journal of International LawInternational Review of Law & EconomicsStanford Law ReviewCalifornia Law ReviewUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, and Virginia Law Review. His scholarship has been cited by appellate courts in the U.S. and around the world.

His expertise is often sought out and quoted by major news organizations such the New York TimesWall Street Journal, NPR News, The New YorkerLos Angeles Times, and numerous television and radio programs. Prof. Kontorovich’s popular writings have appeared in the New York TimesWall Street JournalLos Angeles TimesPOLITICOCommentaryHaaretz, and numerous other leading publications. He is a frequent contributor to the Wall Street Journal’s editorial pages.

He attended the University of Chicago for college and law school. After law school, he clerked for Judge Richard Posner on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. He has been honored with a fellowship at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, in 2011-12, and with the Federalist Society’s prestigious Bator Award, given annually to a young scholar (under 40), for outstanding scholarship and teaching.

Benjamin Ryberg

Benjamin Ryberg, an attorney, is the Chief Operating Officer and Director of Research at The Lawfare Project, the only international organization dedicated to enforcing and protecting the civil and human rights of the Jewish people via strategic legal actions.

Benjamin received his undergraduate degree with a double major in Economics and Organizational Studies from the University of Michigan, and his Juris Doctor at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. At Cardozo, Benjamin served as Senior Articles Editor of the Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, which published his note, Pro-Competitive or Protective?: The Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law, Implications for the United States, and Bilateral Antitrust Cooperation as an Effective Response.

In 2013, he was profiled in The Jewish Week’s “36 Under 36” list of young visionaries. A seasoned public speaker, he has appeared on radio and television programming and addressed a range of audiences including at the AIPAC Policy Conference, the Alpha Epsilon Pi International Convention, and the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs Global Coalition for Israel summits.

The Jerusalem Post

~    October 26, 2021 21:43 ~
Jewish on Campus and World Jewish Congress (WJC) have announced a joint partnership to support Jewish students and combat antisemitism on college campuses, which is reportedly rising, both organizations stated on Tuesday.
“College campuses should be a place that allows for the free expression of thought and exploration of ideas, not a breeding ground for hatred and antisemitism,” said WJC President Ronald S. Lauder on the World Jewish Congress website.
Antisemitism has been frequent on college campuses, as a recent study concluded that 43% of Jewish students on American college campuses have personally experienced antisemitism or witnessed antisemitic activity. Last month, another report came out stating that half of Jewish college students have hidden their religious identity.
However, Jewish on Campus, a non-profit organization that began last year as an Instagram page, wrote on Twitter that the partnership “will work to create strong academic programming, advocate for student protection under the Civil Rights Act, and form a representative body of Jewish students through our Ambassador Program.”
Both organizations will also support Jewish student communities outside the United States.
Co-founder and CEO of Jewish on Campus, Julia Jassey, stated: “One thing that we hope to do is have more of an international focus. Jewish on Campus is really thankful to the World Jewish Congress and Ambassador Ronald S. Lauder for giving us this opportunity because it’s one that students often don’t have.
“My hope for Jewish on Campus is that we will be an organization that students know about on campus,” Jassey continued.
This collaboration is part of WJC’s NextGen Inc., a program that works with next-generation leaders to ensure Jewish people worldwide are supported and united in fighting against bigotry, according to their website.
A recent example of antisemitism at a college campus included participants at a rally hosted by Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) at the University of Massachusetts, where an attendant recorded on video spitting and physically assaulting a journalist who was deemed a “Zionist,” according to the Louis D. Brandeis Center.
The incident took place in June at the Anti-Defamation League’s New England Regional Office in Boston. The journalist in question was called a Nazi solely on his perceived identity as a Zionist. The harassment lasted for a reported seven minutes.
The incident violates UMass’ Student Code of Conduct, according to the report, and that the university is required to investigate students who violate the code. The Brandeis Center warned that no action taken would indicate that “students and student organizations are free to intimidate, harass, and assault individuals who attend their events, based on such individuals’ perceived support of Israel.”
The university has yet to do anything about the incident.
Jeremy Sharon contributed to this report.

Jewish News Syndicate

~ BY SEAN SAVAGE October 26, 2021 ~

 A Jewish civil-rights group is calling on the University of Massachusetts Boston to investigate an incident that occurred this summer, where pro-Palestinian activists targeted and accosted a journalist over his views on Israel.

The event took place on June 24 in front of the Anti-Defamation League’s New England Regional Office in Boston.

Dexter Van Zile, a journalist with the watchdog group CAMERA, was “accosted, spat at, shoved, and called a Nazi and a pig solely based on his perceived identity as a Zionist,” by members of the UMass Boston chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), who were protesting in front of the ADL office, according to the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under the Law.

The group says that the incident was immediately reported to UMass, which has not taken any action.

“The videos taken by the CAMERA reporters speak for themselves: Mr. Van Zile was attacked at the UMass Boston SJP event because he has been a vocal supporter of Israel. Unfortunately, it appears the university has done nothing in the three-plus months since Mr. Van Zile filed his complaints, accompanied by this documentation. By its silence, the university has implicitly condoned the conduct of UMass Boston SJP … ,” wrote the Brandeis Center in its letter on Tuesday to the university.

It added that “if the university fails to act, its Jewish students are left to wonder what might happen to them if they were to go anywhere near a UMass Boston SJP rally, let alone dare to voice their objections to the anti-Semitic discourse of the organization’s speakers.”

According to the Brandeis Center, the behavior by the pro-Palestinian students “directly violates the UMass Student Code of Conduct, which applies to misconduct even at off-campus events that are hosted by or affiliated with student organizations, registered or unregistered.”

It also noted that the university is required to investigate and sanction students or groups that violate this code.

The center warned that should the university fail to do so, administrators send a dangerous message that “students and student organizations are free to intimidate, harass and assault individuals who attend their events, based on such individuals’ perceived support of Israel,” and that “the school is a refuge for students [and student organizations] ready to disregard the rights of others and to inflict physical harm on individuals who belong to ‘out’ groups.”

“It is outrageous that participants in a protest hosted by a registered student group would feel free to insult, intimidate and physically assault a reporter silently covering the event simply because he was identified as a ‘Zionist,’ ” Rachel Lerman, vice chair of the Brandeis Center, told JNS. “If the university does nothing about attacks like this, it effectively condones them, sending an ugly message and setting a dangerous precedent. It’s almost a wink and a nod at groups like SJP that their behavior will be given a pass, even when it violates the law and the university code of conduct, so long as the target is a ‘Zionist.’ ”

Lerman added that “we know from our recent survey that Jewish students are already wary of publicly expressing their Jewish identity. Groups like SJP and Sunrise DC cannot be given carte blanche to treat supporters of Israel as racists—marginalizing and excluding Jews who affiliate with Israel as part of their ethnic identity is not just unlawful, history has shown us that it leads to violence, as this instance demonstrates.”

Fox News

~ By Adam Sabes | Fox News – October 26, 2021 ~

A Jewish civil rights organization is calling out the University of Massachusetts, Boston for its inaction on an investigation into a campus organization for hosting a pro-Palestine rally that turned violent.

The Louis D. Brandeis Center sent a letter to the university on Tuesday demanding that it open an investigation into the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter, which hosted the rally on June 24, as well as any students involved in the incident.

According to the letter, Dexter Van Zile a reporter for CAMERA, was “intimidated, harassed, and assaulted” after one participant in the rally called him a “rabid Zionist.”

Video footage of the event shows protesters shouting “Zionist, go home!” which was directed at Van Zile, and many people gathered around him.

While several protesters gave Van Zile “the finger,” someone shouted, “Don’t give him ammunition” and “They will use this against us.”

REP. TLAIB PRAISES GROUP THAT CALLS TO END US AID TO ISRAEL: ‘I GET STRENGTH FROM ALL OF YOU’

According to the letter, the protest began outside the Massachusetts State House and then protesters demonstrated outside of a Anti-Defamation League office.

Van Zile told Fox News that what he experienced at the protest were “the worst seven minutes of my life.”

As a result of the incident, Van Zile said he doesn’t like to go out in public too much and worries that the protesters at the event will identify him walking the streets of Boston, Massachusetts.

Massachusetts State House in Boston

Massachusetts State House in Boston

However, Van Zile said that while he was lucky to go on with his life after the event, students at the University of Massachusetts, Boston may not.

“Suppose I was a Jew on the campus of UMass Boston and I had to share public space with these folks,” Van Zile said. “These people may, you know, if they’re willing to mob me in broad daylight in the streets of Boston, the way they did, what do you think they’re going to do to a Jew on their campus, when they don’t think anyone is looking? And that’s the thing that I find very, very concerning.”

The Louis D. Brandeis Center letter states that even though the event took place off-campus, students are still responsible for their actions according to the university student code of conduct.

Boston, Massachusetts, USA - May 21, 2017: Daytime view of the University of Massachusetts Boston campus along the Boston Harborwalk

Boston, Massachusetts, USA – May 21, 2017: Daytime view of the University of Massachusetts Boston campus along the Boston Harborwalk

“Mr. Van Zile was attacked at the UMass Boston SJP event because he has been a vocal supporter of Israel. Unfortunately, it appears the University has done nothing in the three-plus months since Mr. Van Zile filed his complaints, accompanied by this documentation,” the letter states.

The Louis D. Brandeis Center also asked the university to issue a public statement affirming that they will protect the rights of Jewish students “for whom Zionism is an integral part of their identity.”

Denise Katz-Prober, the director of legal initiatives at the Louis D. Brandeis Center told Fox News that instances like this are hardly limited to the University of Massachusetts, Boston.

“Recently just last year at Tufts University, [Students for Justice in Palestine] led a similar campaign of intimidation against a Zionist Jewish student there in an attempt to kick him out of student government,” Katz-Prober said.

Israeli flag flying over Jerusalem and the Temple Mount 

Katz-Prober also said that the silence by the University of Massachusetts, Boston administration on the incident leaves Jewish and pro-Israel students wondering if they can feel safe on campus.

“I think [Jewish and pro-Israel students] are left wondering what happens If they go anywhere near an event organized by or hosted by SJP? Are they going to be harassed, assaulted, targeted similarly to Mr. Van Zile, simply because of their Jewish identity?” Katz-Prober asked. “No student should have to have that concern.”

DeWayne Lehman, the director of communications for the University of Massachusetts Boston told Fox News that the university is investigating the incident, but added that the investigation is “governed by federal student privacy regulations.”

Fox News reached out to the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter at the University of Massachusetts Boston.

Adam Sabes is a writer at Fox News. You can reach him at Adam.Sabes@fox.com.

Contact: Nicole Rosen – 202-309-5724

 

Participants at UMass Student Rally Caught on Tape Harassing, Spitting at

and Shoving ‘Zionist’

Civil Rights Group Demands Investigation

Washington, D.C., October 26: The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law today called on the University of Massachusetts (UMass) to investigate an incident where participants in a rally hosted by the UMass chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) intimidated, harassed, and assaulted an individual for being pro-Israel. (Read LDB’s letter here.)

The “unlawful and deeply disturbing” incident took place on June 24 in front of the Anti-Defamation League’s New England Regional Office in Boston at which a journalist was accosted, spat at, shoved and called a Nazi and a pig solely based on his perceived identity as a Zionist. The reporter, Dexter Van Zile, works for CAMERA, an organization that seeks to bring accuracy to reporting on the Middle East. He was writing his story quietly at the edge of the protest when he was assaulted. The harassment went on for a full seven minutes, and the journalist continues to experience trauma as a result. SJP is a UMass registered student organization.

The Brandeis Center points out “the students attacked Mr. Van Zile based on his support for the State of Israel, and his association with ‘Zionists,’ a term applied to Jews, and increasingly used as a synonym for Jews,” and the misconduct here “is a case of assault – in the criminal sense of the term.”  The event is well-documented in videos taken by other CAMERA reporters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HH2Tb8Nk9QM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AN3fbsxiZGM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZATKGAdbxrI

The incident was immediately reported to UMass and the university has yet to take any action.

“The videos taken by the CAMERA reporters speak for themselves: Mr. Van Zile was attacked at the UMass Boston SJP event because he has been a vocal supporter of Israel. Unfortunately, it appears the University has done nothing in the three-plus months since Mr. Van Zile filed his complaints, accompanied by this documentation. By its silence, the University has implicitly condoned the conduct of UMass Boston SJP…,” wrote the Brandeis Center in its letter to the University today.  “If the University fails to act, its Jewish students are left to wonder what might happen to them if they were to go anywhere near a UMass Boston SJP rally, let alone dare to voice their objections to the anti-Semitic discourse of the organization’s speakers.”

SJP’s behavior directly violates UMass’ Student Code of Conduct, which applies to misconduct even at off campus events that are hosted by or affiliated with student organizations, registered or unregistered. The Code unequivocally condemns conduct of the type committed here by students, student organizations, and/or their guests, and requires the University to investigate and sanction students or student organizations that violate the Code.

The Brandeis Center warned that should the University fail to investigate as required they are sending a dangerous message that “students and student organizations are free to intimidate, harass, and assault individuals who attend their events, based on such individuals’ perceived support of Israel” and that “the school is a refuge for students (and student organizations) ready to disregard the rights of others and to inflict physical harm on individuals who belong to ‘out’ groups.”

The harm such a message sends is confirmed by a recent poll conducted by the Brandeis Center, revealing that more than 65% of the college students surveyed have felt unsafe on campus, and roughly 50% have felt the need to hide their Jewish identity.

The Brandeis Center called on the University to investigate the incident, identify students who were involved in conduct that violates the Code and appropriately sanction those students.  The Brandeis Center also urged UMass to make a public statement advising its community that it will safeguard the rights of Jewish students for whom Zionism is an integral part of their identity.

Last year, after the Brandeis Center, in consultation with Jewish United Fund and Hillel International, filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education on behalf of University of Illinois Jewish students, the University of Illinois issued a similar statement acknowledging that “[f]or many Jewish students, Zionism is an integral part of their identity and their ethnic and ancestral heritage.  These students have the right to openly express identification with Israel. The university will safeguard the abilities to these students, as well as all students, to participate in university-sponsored activities free from discrimination and harassment.”  The University statement went on to say “[w]e deplore anti-Semitic incidents on campus, including those that demonize or delegitimize Jewish and pro-Israel students or compare them to Nazis.  This subjects them to double standards that are not applied to others.”

###

About The Louis D. Brandeis Center: The Louis D. Brandeis Center, Inc., or LDB, is an independent, nonprofit organization established to advance the civil and human rights of the Jewish people and promote justice for all. The Brandeis Center conducts research, education, and advocacy to combat the resurgence of anti-Semitism on college and university campuses. It is not affiliated with the Massachusetts university, the Kentucky law school, or any of the other institutions that share the name and honor the memory of the late U.S. Supreme Court justice.

 

Newsweek

BY 

Jewish Rights groups are condemning what they see as anti-Semitic sentiment by the Washington, D.C. affiliate of climate group Sunrise Movement for their refusal to participate in Saturday’s voting rights rally because “Zionist groups” are taking part.

The Anti-Defamation League, pro-Israel nonprofit StandWithUs and Israel on Campus Coalition are among other groups that have voiced their dismay at Sunrise D.C.’s announcement it wouldn’t take part in Saturday’s event because of the presence of groups that support a Jewish homeland in Israel.

“This has nothing to do with foreign policy or geopolitics. This is a well-known progressive organization saying it doesn’t want to associate with Jews unless the Jews meet certain preconditions,” Jacob Baime, CEO of Israel on Campus Coalition, told Newsweek.

The ICC works to unite and empower pro-Israel campus organizations through strategic coordination and expertise to strengthen support for Israel.

“A religious litmus test does nothing to advance the cause of climate justice, but it does go a long way toward making Jews feel unwelcome and unsafe in progressive spaces,” he added.

Protesters from the Sunrise Movement
Said Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the ADL, “Sunrise Movement D.C. is refusing participation in a voting rights rally because of the presence of ‘Zionist organizations.’ This is the vilification of Jewish nationhood and a litmus test for all who support it. This is antisemitic—plain and simple.”It was earlier this week that the D.C. chapter of the environmental group posted a statement on Twitter announcing it wouldn’t be participating in the upcoming voting rights rally and was declining a speaking slot “due to the participation of a number of Zionist groups.”

Its statement went on to cite the participation of the Jewish Council of Public Affairs (JCPA), National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW) and Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism (RAC) in the Freedom to Vote Relay—Rally at the Finish Line, which it said were all “in alignment and in support of Zionism and the State of Israel.”

“Given our commitment to racial justice, self-governance, and indigenous sovereignty, we oppose Zionism and any state that enforces its ideology,” it continued and went on to implicate Israel in its occupation of the land of Palestine and its people, of continuing to use “violent, oppressive tactics” against Palestinians.

“As a colonial project, Israel routinely displaces Palestinians through the construction of settlements and the wholesale theft of homes and land. It also treats all Palestinians, as well as Black and brown Jewish-Israelis, as second-class citizens who have virtually, often subjecting them to extreme policing and brutality,” it read.

In response, the Sunrise Movement national climate organization on Thursday distanced itself from Sunrise D.C. but stopped short of censuring the local chapter.

Noting that it’s a “decentralized grassroots movement with each acting independently,” the national climate change organization clarified that it wasn’t given the chance to look at the D.C. chapter’s statement before it came out.

“Sunrise is a movement of young people from all paths of life committed to stopping climate change and creating millions of good-paying jobs in the process. Our work on behalf of all humanity is rooted in the value of human dignity and we reject all forms of discrimination, including anti-Semitism and anti-Palestinian racism,” the national organization posted.

That statement was met by an unsatisfactory response from the ADL’s Greenblatt.

“Hey @sunrisemvmt – your statement doesn’t do it. Saying you reject #antisemitism is not the same thing as rejecting anti-Jewish hatred as it happens in real life. Not to mention you failed to clearly and unequivocally condemn the anti-Semitic call to exclude Jewish groups,” he tweeted.

Then Sunrise Movement on Friday tweeted a clarification, “To be clear, Sunrise DC’s statement and actions are not in line with our values. Singling out Jewish organizations for removal from a coalition, despite others holding similar views, is antisemitic and unacceptable.”

None of the back-and-forth satisfied those representing Jewish rights or those that are pro-Israel.

“Antisemitism is always irrational, but this is a new level of incoherence, ignorance, and hate. Sunrise D.C. claims to ‘support’ sovereignty, statehood, and self-determination. Yet in the same breath they oppose those exact rights for Jewish people and boycott Jewish groups for having the audacity to support Israel’s existence,” said Roz Rothstein, co-founder and CEO of StandWithUs. “The D.C. chapter should be ashamed, as should the national movement which implied that this statement was somehow part of, ‘the fight for collective liberation.'”

“The incident with Sunrise D.C. this week shines a spotlight on something that has been happening on college campuses for years and is now mainstreaming onto the national stage—the shunning and exclusion of Jews from progressive causes,” said Alyza Lewin, president of The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law. “Sunrise D.C. took a rally about voting rights—a topic on which it agrees with these Jewish organizations, and converted it—not into a discussion, or even a debate, on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, but rather into an opportunity to marginalize and slander Jews.”

“It’s time for courageous leadership to stand up and call this what it is—the dictionary definition of antisemitism. At what point do we say enough is enough?” said Baime.

Calling all Cardozo Law Students!!

The Brandeis Center’s Cardozo Law Student Chapter hosts its first general meeting of the 2021-2022 academic year on Wednesday, November 3rd at noon EST.  LDB’s Director of Legal Initiatives, Denise Katz-Prober, will join to update students on the Brandeis Center’s work and how law students can become involved in the legal battle against anti-Semitism on campus, through LDB programming including student law school chapters, JIGSAW Fellowships and career opportunities at the Brandeis Center.

Newsweek

~ Nathan Lewin and Alyza Lewin, Lewin & Lewin, LLP (October 14, 2021) ~

Many consider the Biden administration’s oft-expressed intent to open a U.S. consulate-general in Jerusalem a minor administrative change. In fact, it is a dangerous resurrection of a fiction that dominated American attitudes and policy toward Israel for decades.

It is nothing less than a devious scheme to reverse U.S. recognition that Jerusalem is in Israel by pressuring Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett to abandon Israel’s claim to sovereignty over its own capital city. If Bennett acquiesces to U.S. pressure, he will go down in history as the Israeli leader who gave away Jerusalem.

In May 1948, President Harry Truman was the first world leader to recognize the modern State of Israel, only 11 minutes after its creation. But for the following 70 years, successive U.S. presidential administrations steadfastly refused to formally recognize the City of Jerusalem as being in the State of Israel. It took us 18 years of pro bono litigation, with two appearances before the U.S. Supreme Court and working with the prior administration, to overturn the State Department’s long-running position. That position had effectively treated as stateless thousands of American citizens born in Jerusalem.

We began representing Menachem Binyamin Zivotofsky soon after he was born in Jerusalem. His American-born parents sought for him what most people take for granted—the right to list his country of birth on his American identity papers. That right was denied to him for almost two decades. His government-issued American birth certificate left blank the space for his country of birth. Although U.S. passports routinely designate the country of a foreign-born passport-holder’s birth, Menachem’s listed “Jerusalem” instead of “Israel”—as if the City of Jerusalem was not actually in any country.

Congress had overwhelmingly endorsed Israel’s assertion of sovereign jurisdiction over Jerusalem in the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995. Nonetheless, Presidents Bill ClintonGeorge W. Bush and Barack Obama—yielding to the State Department’s Arabist contingent—overrode Congress‘ decision with various baseless “findings.” They continued to deny that any portion of the city (neither “West” nor “East” Jerusalem) was actually in Israel. This led to confusion and embarrassment.

In September 2016, President Obama delivered a eulogy at the funeral of former Israeli President Shimon Peres. The funeral was held on Mt. Herzl, Israel’s national cemetery—a location comparable to Arlington National Cemetery in the United States. The White House published the president’s remarks with the tagline: “Mt. Herzl, Jerusalem, Israel.” Hours later, the White House issued a “corrected” version of President Obama’s remarks with only a single “correction”—a line strike-through the word “Israel.” American foreign policy thus viewed the distinguished cemetery on Mt. Herzl—which has been under Israel’s sovereign control since the modern Jewish state was established in 1948—as not being located in Israel.

This picture shows an Israeli flag fluttering
This picture shows an Israeli flag fluttering above a building near the Dome of the Rock mosque in the Old City of Jerusalem, on July 18, 2021.AHMAD GHARABLI/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

The State Department did not apply this policy even-handedly. Opponents of Israel born before 1948 could, if they chose, designate on their passports “Palestine” as their place of birth, as if the Jewish State had never been created. Those born in Tel Aviv or Haifa who were unhappy to see “Israel” on their U.S. passports were entitled to substitute the city in which they were born for the country. Only American citizens born in Jerusalem were denied this choice of individual identification.

The Supreme Court concluded our marathon lawsuit for Menachem Zivotofsky with a definitive ruling giving the president sole and exclusive constitutional authority to recognize foreign governments and their boundaries, including the location of cities. While the Court’s 2015 decision looked like a defeat, it actually turned into a triumph when, in December 2017, the previous U.S. administration formally recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

In May 2018, the U.S. embassy was relocated from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, rendering the Jerusalem consulate superfluous. Up until that time, pursuant to the U.S. fiction that treated Jerusalem as a city outside Israel, the U.S. consul-general in Jerusalem reported directly to the State Department—as if he were reporting from a location not in Israel. All this changed when the U.S. administration recognized Jerusalem as not only being in Israel but as Israel’s capital, thereby merging the consulate and the embassy. The building on David Flusser Street in the Talpiot neighborhood of Jerusalem that had housed the U.S. consulate was converted into the new U.S. embassy. The operations that had been conducted there and at the annex on Agron Street in downtown Jerusalem were brought under the auspices of the embassy, thus finally achieving full legal compliance with the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995.

The Proclamation recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel opens with the following words: “The foreign policy of the United States is grounded in principled realism, which begins with an honest acknowledgment of plain facts.” It took nearly seven decades for the United States to formally recognize the “plain fact” that Jerusalem is located in the State of Israel. Moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and consolidating the operations of the Jerusalem consulate and the U.S. embassy followed directly from that “plain fact.” In further recognition of that “plain fact,” the State Department changed its passport policy in October 2020 to finally provide American citizens born in Jerusalem with what they, and our client, had fought for—the right to list “Israel” as their country of birth.

The consular and diplomatic services that have been offered since 1844 by the Jerusalem consulate are currently available for everyone to access in the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem. If the Biden administration wishes to make these services more accessible to Palestinians, a consulate could be opened in Ramallah, near the government headquarters of the Palestinian Authority, under the auspices of the U.S. embassy operating in Israel’s capital. But there is no practical reason to now open a separate consulate in Jerusalem.

This is not about dividing Jerusalem. It is about denying Israel’s sovereignty over Jerusalem. The American diplomats who conduct the embassy’s Palestinian Affairs Unit currently have their office in the heart of West Jerusalem on Agron Street, an area that has been under Israel’s control since 1948. If the Biden administration converts the Agron Street complex or any location in Jerusalem into a de facto embassy to the Palestinian Authority, complete with a consul-general who reports not to the U.S. ambassador but directly to the State Department, America would be resurrecting from the grave a dangerous fabrication that it finally buried three years ago.

America, in short, would yet again be proclaiming to the world that Jerusalem, including West Jerusalem, is not part of the sovereign State of Israel. The new administration should not make this mistake.

Nathan Lewin and Alyza D. Lewin are Washington, D.C. attorneys who litigated the Zivotofsky passport case pro-bono for 18 years (twice to the U.S. Supreme Court) in order that Jerusalem-born American citizens could list “Israel” as their place of birth.

Hudson Valley One

/by //

If you experience, or witness first-hand, an anti-Semitic act in Ulster County, you have somewhere to turn for help. The Jewish Federation of Ulster County (UCJF) has launched a hotline, (845) 859-9858, which will be monitored 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to accept reports of anti-Semitic incidents and help callers deal with the aftermath, whether it involves emotional trauma or the need for legal action.

David Drimer, Executive Director of the Jewish Federation of Ulster County.

The first step in response to such an incident is to call the police, said David Drimer, UCJF executive director. “The next call should be us.” Another option is fill out a form on the website https://www.ucjf.org.

The organization has been considering establishing a hotline for some time, given research provided by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that shows 63 percent of American Jews experienced or witnessed anti-Semitism over the last five years. In a survey, 59 percent of respondents said they felt less safe than they did a decade ago, and 49 percent fear a violent attack at a synagogue. 

The UCJF speeded up their plans for a hotline when they learned of three alarming incidents in the county over a recent four-week period. New Paltz police investigated a swastika graffiti at Hasbrouck Park and promptly reported it to the UCJF, the ADL, and a local rabbi. Subsequently, virulently anti-Semitic and threatening multipage manifestos were hand-delivered to a synagogue and a private business in our area.

“We believe it’s imperative to do this now,” said Drimer, “before something more serious happens. It would be imprudent to wait for something disastrous.”

Someone who calls the hotline must have actually witnessed the occurrence, as opposed to conveying a rumor. A digital service will direct the call to a volunteer or staff member of UCJF, and if they don’t pick immediately, they will be alerted and call back within minutes. 

“We’ll ask people a list of questions,” said Drimer, “including what happened, if they’ve called law enforcement. If there might be a criminal act involved, or if they’re in anxiety of danger, they should immediately call law enforcement. We’ll ask for details of the incident and what resolution the caller might like to see.”

Resolution might involve an investigation, an arrest, an indictment, a policy change. In a case where someone believes they have been discriminated against with regard to housing or employment, a report can be made to government agencies for reporting bias incidents. “We can advise the complainant on framing a complaint, and if they’re not getting an adequate response, we might call in the media,” said Drimer. 

He is particularly concerned about students, who can be subjected to anti-Semitic harassment online, especially on social media platforms. “We plan to vigorously respond to any confirmed reports of this type of activity that we receive, since Jewish youth are especially susceptible to exposure to this kind of hateful messaging.” SUNY New Paltz, despite a significant number of Jewish students, does not have a chapter of Hillel, the international college student organization that supports Jewish campus life. If speakers are invited to the college to discuss issues surrounding Israel, said Drimer, “there might be tension, and we’d help respond.” 

UCJF will work with its partner organizations in evaluating potential legal action, engaging government agencies, and coordinating news media response, if applicable. If callers wish to remain anonymous, their identities will not be divulged to third parties. 

Resources that can be mobilized include technical and logistical support from the Secure Community Network and the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law. The Brandeis Center is an independent, non-partisan institution for public interest advocacy. It was founded by civil rights attorney Ken Marcus, who has returned to lead the organization after serving as Assistant US Secretary of Education for Civil Rights. UCJF has also made connections to government agencies, including the New Paltz police and Kingston mayor Steve Noble.

 “We’ll work with you as long as you feel we’re making a positive contribution,” Drimer stated. “We want everyone to know Ulster County stands united against anti-Semitism, and bias won’t be tolerated. I wish we had the resources to represent everyone, but we’re starting here. We hope that the phone will never ring, that anti-Semitism will not rear its head. But we know that’s not likely to happen.”

To report an incident of anti-Semitism to the Jewish Federation of Ulster County hotline, call (845) 859-9858 or fill out the intake form at https://www.ucjf.org.